The New Age of Interdependence
- Submitted by Patrick Oborn, Co-Founder, Telarus, Inc. Until 2003, all Master Agencies were pretty much the same. Each of them had (and still has) the self-proclaimed job description of acting as in intermediary between agents and carriers. Many of them have tried to distinguish themselves by providing a "back office" which is comprised of dozens of people who push paperwork, follow up with vendors on order status, and provide the necessary accounting support to provide agents with accurate and on-time commission payments. Since then there have been a few companies who have taken a different approach to being a master agent. One Master Agent cut out all "back office" personnel in order to offer the highest commissions possible, selling "subscriptions" to agents to obtain these high commissions. Some agents jumped at the idea of super-high commissions and paid the gateway fee while others passed on the opportunity to make a higher gross commission in favor of the status quo. The Master Agency that Adam Edwards and I started in 2003, Telarus, Inc., was one of the few (if not only) Master Agencies born of non-telecom veterans. Our naiveté was both a blessing and a challenge which ultimately led to the creation of the "next generation" Master Agent. Coming from an aerospace engineering and big-5 accounting firm background, we saw the entire telecom agent setup as a big "mess". Agents needed Master Agents just to sort out all of the disorganization coming from the carriers, each one with their own rat's nest of paperwork, pricing, and commission plans. Add to that the "island" approach to working in the telecom business, ergo agents dealing with a Master Agent on a one-to-one basis, competing with one another for business, and you have a recipe for independence. That independence comes with a price, however. here is only so much a human being can do in a day. There are only so many customers an agent can call in any 24-hour period. As agents grow to around 200 clients, the work required to maintain the base of customers becomes a full-time job. Agents hit a saturation limit and their income growth is artificially capped. Granted, 200 clients should equal over $15,000/month in commission, which is nothing to sneeze at – but the glass ceiling exists nevertheless. All of these things entered into our planning of Telarus. We could only succeed if we could figure out at way to get most of the people in the "back office" to go away through automation (we were funding the business with our savings accounts, which forced us to automate). We could only provide value to agents if we could get price quotes to them in 5 seconds, again, through automation. We could only allow agents to break through that "glass ceiling" by creating an in-house CRM system that actually allowed them to work together on deals, and to split up the lead generation and sales pieces of the sales process, and to interact with VARs. Likewise we would need to create a system to allow agents to grow beyond themselves, to hire administrative staff, and to eventually mature into master agents themselves. Not coming from the 1980's and 1990's telecom crowd, things like this just made logical sense to us. We did not have decades of old dinosaur telecom logic engrained into our consciousness and thus, our business plan was and remains radically different. But even with what we thought was a great plan, we always let our agents guide the ultimate shape and form of Telarus. Each week we meet will ALL of our agents on a conference call to discuss what's working and what's not about our program, our software, our vendors, and our staff. Our agents are painfully honest in their feedback, but we see it as our job to create the software infrastructure they need to succeed as agents, and eventually as master agents. So which kind of Master Agent is right for you? Here is a quick checklist that you may consider when making your choice: A "traditional" Master Agent is for you if:
A "next generation" Master Agent is for you if:
As you can see, there is a wealth of differences between the two main types of Master Agent. When making a decision about which one is best for you, keep in mind your own goals and end-game. Figure out where you would like to be in five years and then align your goals with the Master Agent that makes the most sense. Are you looking for a solid income stream that will afford you a comfortable living, or are you looking to create a system and employ people in hopes of building a substantial book of business? Independence is good, but interdependence is the only thing that can help you shatter the glass ceiling that hangs over the head of every agent in this business. Want to respond or add to this blog? Send printable replies to Dan@TelecomAssociation.com |
|
Telecom Association, Inc.
Copyright © 1995 - 2007. All rights reserved,
31500 Grape Street #3-307 Lake Elsinore, CA 92532